Autocratic parenting of a humanoid robot: A QEEG-based case study
Abstract
There are four parenting styles based on two indicators of parental affection (parental responsiveness) and parental control (parental strictness). When there is no balance between the love and strictness of the parents, the child sees various damages in different psychological, biological, and social dimensions. These injuries can be continuous and overshadow his whole life. This article is a comprehensive review of the life of a 21-year-old girl with an authoritarian parenting style, i.e., low affection and high strictness. The mother has grown up and this way of interacting with her continues from the mother’s side. Various results have shown that this girl, like her peers, has lost the ability to manage her life and basic human functions such as judgment, decision-making, planning, proper interpersonal communication, continuing education, and recognizing her interests and identity. It has become a robot that only obeys its mother and substitutes for the source of power to gain their satisfaction.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Pearson N, Atkin AJ, Biddle SJ, et al. Parenting styles, family structure and adolescent dietary behaviour. Public Health Nutrition. 2009; 13(8): 1245-1253. doi: 10.1017/s1368980009992217
2. Shahsavari M. A general overview on parenting styles and its effective factors. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2012; 6(8): 139-142.
3. Bakhtavar M, Bayova R. Effects of intra-family parameters: Educative style and academic knowledge of parents and their economic conditions on teenager’s personality and behavior. Educational Research and Reviews. 2015; 10(23): 2887-2896. doi: 10.5897/err2015.2348
4. Bakhtavar M. The relationship between parenting styles and parental demographic components with their children personality types. Journal of Psychological Science. 2020; 19(86): 159-169.
5. Baumrind D. Early socialization and adolescent competence. In: Dragastin SE, Elder GH. Ed. Adolescence in the life cycle: psychological change and social context. New York: Wiley. 1978.
6. Mandara J. The typological approach in child and family psychology: A review of theory, methods, and research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2003; 6: 129-146.
7. Schaefer ES. A circumplex model for maternal behavior. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1959; 59(2): 226-235. doi: 10.1037/h0041114
8. Tozandehjani H, Tavakolizadeh J, Lagzian Z. The effect of parenting styles on self-efficacy and mental health of students. Internal Medicine Today. 2011; 17(2): 56-64.
9. Bandura A. Cultivate Self‐efficacy for Personal and Organizational Effectiveness. Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior. Published online January 2, 2012: 179-200. doi: 10.1002/9781119206422.ch10
10. Oppenheimer CW, Hankin BL, Young J. Effect of Parenting and Peer Stressors on Cognitive Vulnerability and Risk for Depression among Youth. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2017; 46(3): 597-612. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0315-4
11. Esmaeilpour F, Hashemi T, Badri R. The role of perceived parenting styles and borderline personality disorder in cyberbullying: mediate empathy. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry. 2018; 5(2): 81-92. doi: 10.29252/shenakht.5.2.81
12. Mezei J, Juhasz A, Kilencz T, Vizin G. Borderline personality disorder in the light of developmental psychopathology (Hungarian). Neuropsychopharmacol. Hung. 2020; 22: 102-111.
13. Lomanowska AM, Boivin M, Hertzman C, et al. Parenting begets parenting: A neurobiological perspective on early adversity and the transmission of parenting styles across generations. Neuroscience. 2017; 342: 120-139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.09.029
14. Mącik D. Temperament, parenting styles and the intensity of early maladaptive schemas: assessment of correlations in a non-clinical adult group. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2020; 49(2): 218-232. doi: 10.1017/s1352465820000831
15. Ramezankhani F, Sadeghi M, Goodarzi K. Comparing the Effectiveness of Teaching Mirror Neuron Strategies and Brain Executive Function on the Function of the Frontal Lobe of Boys with Conduct Disorder. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2020; 16(2): 155-161.
16. Olsavsky AK, Telzer EH, Shapiro M, et al. Indiscriminate Amygdala Response to Mothers and Strangers After Early Maternal Deprivation. Biological Psychiatry. 2013; 74(11): 853-860. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/apr.v2i1.504
(58 Abstract Views, 19 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Seyyedeh Sahar Asgari Ghalebin, Akbar Atadokht, Seyyedeh Mahsa Mousavi
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.