Open Journal Systems

Manifesting the academic psychological contract

Alan Johnston

Abstract

The level of research undertaken on the academic psychological contract, and its influence on academic’s behaviour is limited. This paper seeks to consider the academic psychological contract, by reviewing its manifestation within the role of and the influence on their undertaking of the role. Particularly important is academics’ interpretation of the role and what they consider important. Within this, the paper considers in-role and extra-role activities and what may be the grey areas in which time is spent. The research adopts the combined usage of phenomenology with interpretivist processes to investigate the insights of eighteen academics at nine UK University Business Schools. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect to consider the constructs’ manifestation. Key aspects of behaviour were identified as discretionary effort and autonomy and managerialism with links to academic citizenship.


Keywords

academics; psychological contract; discretionary effort; autonomy; managerialism; academic citizenship

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. DelCampo RG. Understanding the psychological contract: a direction for the future. Management Research News. 2007, 30(6): 432-440. doi: 10.1108/01409170710751926

2. Krivokapic-Skoko B, O’Neill G. University academics’ psychological contracts in Australia: A mixed methods research approach. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2008; 6(1): 61–72.

3. Bryson C. What about the workers? The expansion of higher education and the transformation of academic work. Industrial Relations Journal. 2004, 35(1): 38-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2338.2004.00299.x

4. Deem R. Changing Research Perspectives on the Management of Higher Education: Can Research Permeate the Activities of Manager‐Academics? Higher Education Quarterly. 2006, 60(3): 203-228. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2006.00322.x

5. Deem R, Brehony KJ. Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education. 2005, 31(2): 217-235. doi: 10.1080/03054980500117827

6. Rousseau DM. New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1990, 11(5): 389-400. doi: 10.1002/job.4030110506

7. Herriot P, Manning WEG, Kidd JM. The Content of the Psychological Contract. British Journal of Management. 1997, 8(2): 151-162. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.0047

8. Coyne I, Gavin F. Employee relations and motivation. In: Lewis R, Zibarras L (editors). Work and Occupational Psychology: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage; 2013.

9. Shen J. University academics’ psychological contracts and their fulfilment. Journal of Management Development. 2010, 29(6): 575-591. doi: 10.1108/02621711011046549

10. Kasekende F, Munene JC, Ntayi JM, et al. The interaction effect of social exchanges on the relationship between organizational climate and psychological contract. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2015, 36(7): 833-848. doi: 10.1108/lodj-01-2014-0007

11. Kasekende F. Psychological contract, engagement and employee discretionary behaviours. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2017, 66(7): 896-913. doi: 10.1108/ijppm-07-2016-0136

12. Herriot P, Pemberton C. Facilitating new deals. Human Resource Management Journal. 1997, 7(1): 45-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.1997.tb00273.x

13. Rousseau D, Schalk R. Psychological Contracts in Employment: Cross-National Perspectives. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2000. doi: 10.4135/9781452231273

14. Wellin M. Managing the Psychological Contract. Gower; 2007.

15. Kelley-Patterson D, George C. Securing graduate commitment: an exploration of the comparative expectations of placement students, graduate recruits and human resource managers within the hospitality, leisure and tourism industries. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2001, 20(4): 311-323. doi: 10.1016/s0278-4319(01)00019-6

16. Jha S, Pingle S. Organizational impact of psychological contract: An empirical study. Review of Management. 2015; 5 (1/2): 31–39.

17. Johnston A. The impact of the psychological contract on academics’ discretionary effort. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human Resource Development Research and Practice. University Forum for Human Resource Development; 7–9 June 2017; Lisbon, Portugal.

18. Marks A. Developing a multiple foci conceptualization of the psychological contract. Employee Relations. 2001, 23(5): 454-469. doi: 10.1108/eum0000000005897

19. Guest DE. Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously? Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1998, 19(S1): 649-664. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(1998)19: 1+<649: : aid-job970>3.0.co, 2-t

20. Tallman RJ. Are psychological contracts idiosyncratic. Review of Business Research. 2008; 8(6): 211–218.

21. Rousseau DM, Hansen SD, Tomprou M. A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2018, 39(9): 1081-1098. doi: 10.1002/job.2284

22. Bathmaker S. “So, what’s the deal?” the state of the psychological contract in a ‘new’ university. Journal of Vocational Education & Training. 1999, 51(2): 265-282. doi: 10.1080/13636829900200084

23. Tookey M. The Impact of The Psychological Contract on Job Performance and Satisfaction [PhD thesis]. University of East Anglia; 2013; Unpublished work.

24. Nutakki LP, Reddy MS, Balan S. Psychological contract in the Indian higher education sector. IUP Journal of Soft Skills. 2015; 9(1): 35–44.

25. Sewpersad R, Ruggunan S, Adam JK, et al. The Impact of the Psychological Contract on Academics. SAGE Open. 2019, 9(2): 215824401984012. doi: 10.1177/2158244019840122

26. Gillespie NA, Walsh M, Winefield AH, et al. Occupational stress in universities: Staff perceptions of the causes, consequences and moderators of stress. Work & Stress. 2001, 15(1): 53-72. doi: 10.1080/02678370117944

27. Gammie RG. Psychological Contracts in a Business School Context [PhD thesis]. University of Stirling; 2006; Unpublished work.

28. Miles RE, Snow CC. Designing strategic human resources systems. Organizational Dynamics. 1984, 13(1): 36-52. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(84)90030-5

29. Rousseau DM, Parks JM. The contracts of individuals and organisations. Research in Organisational Behavior. 1993; 15: 1–43.

30. O’Neill G, Krivokapic-Skoko B, Dowell D. Unpacking informal contractual relationships: psychological contracts established by Australian business academics. Irish Journal of Management. 2010; 29(2): 5–33.

31. Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Sage; 2014

32. Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. Research Methods for Business Students, 5th ed. Prentice Hall; 2009.

33. Guercini S. New qualitative research methodologies in management. Simone Guercini P, ed. Management Decision. 2014, 52(4): 662-674. doi: 10.1108/md-11-2013-0592

34. Avramenko A. Inspiration at work: is it an oxymoron? Baltic Journal of Management. 2013, 9(1): 113-130. doi: 10.1108/bjm-07-2013-0110

35. Alvesson M, Ashcraft KL. Interviews. Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges. Published online 2012: 239-257. doi: 10.4135/9781526435620.n14

36. Vardi I. The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life. Higher Education. 2008, 57(4): 499-508. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9159-8

37. Johns G. Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2009, 31(4): 519-542. doi: 10.1002/job.630

38. Macfarlane B. Defining and Rewarding Academic Citizenship: The implications for university promotions policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2007, 29(3): 261-273. doi: 10.1080/13600800701457863

39. Ramdhony A, Francis H. In search of the critical in the concept of engagement: Implications for HRD professionals. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human Resource Development Research and Practice Across Europe; 4–6 June 2014; Edinburgh, Scotland.

40. Stone-Romero EF, Alvarez K, Thompson LF. The construct validity of conceptual and operational definitions of contextual performance and related constructs. Human Resource Management Review. 2009, 19(2): 104-116. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.10.003


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/apr.v2i1.390
(26 Abstract Views, 30 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Alan Johnston


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.