Shaping resilient buildings and cities: Climate change impacts, metrics, and strategies for mitigation and adaptation
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Bouramdane AA. Assessment of CMIP6 multi-model projections worldwide: Which regions are getting warmer and are going through a drought in Africa and Morocco? What changes from CMIP5 to CMIP6? Sustainability 2023; 15(1): 690. doi: 10.3390/su15010690
2. Bouramdane AA. Climate Resilience: Insights from Global Negotiations and Morocco’s Path to Sustainability. Lambert Academic Publishing (LAP); 2023.
3. Bouramdane AA. Morocco’s road to a climate-resilient energy transition: Emissions drivers, solutions, and barriers. 2023. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30108.77442/1
4. Bouramdane AA. Hydrogen, CO2 capture and storage and energy sobriety: Overview (French). Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/7774592 (accessed on 23 November 2023).
5. Calheiros CSC, Stefanakis AI. Green roofs towards circular and resilient cities. Circular Economy and Sustainability 2021; 1(1): 395–411. doi: 10.1007/s43615-021-00033-0
6. Patel P. Building climate-resilient cities, chemical & engineering news. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:212837896 (accessed on 23 November 2023).
7. Shah SA, Seker DZ, Rathore MMU, et al. Towards disaster resilient Smart cities: Can Internet of Things and Big Data analytics be the game changers? IEEE Access 2019; 7: 91885–91903.
8. Marchese D, Linkov I. Can you be smart and resilient at the same time? Environmental science & technology 2017; 51(11): 5867–5868. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01912
9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group I (WGI) Interactive Atlas. Available online: https://interactive-atlas.ipcc.ch/ (accessed on 23 November 2023).
10. Streletskiy DA, Suter LJ, Shiklomanov NI, et al. Assessment of climate change impacts on buildings, structures and infrastructure in the Russian regions on permafrost. Environmental Research Letters 2019; 14(2): 025003. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf5e6
11. Wamsler C. Climate change impacts on cities: Ignore, mitigate or adapt? Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:56136855 (accessed on 23 November 2023).
12. Goodess C, Berk S, Ratna SB, et al. Climate change projections for sustainable and healthy cities. Buildings and Cities 2021; 2(1): 812. doi: 10.5334/bc.111
13. Sesana E, Gagnon AS, Ciantelli C, et al. Climate change impacts on cultural heritage: A literature review. WIREs Climate Change 2021; 12(4). doi: 10.1002/wcc.710
14. Bouramdane AA. Scenarios of Large-Scale Solar Integration with Wind in Morocco: Impact of Storage, Cost, Spatio-Temporal Complementarity and Climate Change [PhD thesis]. Institut Polytechnique de Paris; 2021.
15. Bouramdane AA. RCP 8.5 Climate Change Versus Cost Effect on Optimal Scenario Mixes of Variable and Dispatchable Technologies in Morocco: Climate Model Inter-Comparison. Institut Polytechnique de Paris; 2021.
16. Bouramdane AA. Determining vulnerable areas to warming and drought in africa and morocco based on CMIP6 projections: Towards the implementation of mitigation and adaptation measures. doi: 10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2456
17. Bouramdane AA. Places most sensitive to climate change requiring mitigation and adaptation measures (French). Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/7937556 (accessed on 23 November 2023).
18. Bouramdane AA. Moroccan electricity mix: Challenges facing the climate emergency (French). Energy/mining & Careers 2022. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7594427
19. Bouramdane AA. Operating Photovoltaic Power Plants: Big Data and Modeling [Master’s thesis]. École Polytechnique-GeePs CentraleSupelec; 2018.
20. Yang Q, Huang X, Tang Q. The footprint of urban heat island effect in 302 Chinese cities: Temporal trends and associated factors. Science of The Total Environment 2019; 655: 652–662. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.171
21. Palme M, Lobato AT, Carrasco C. Quantitative analysis of factors contributing to urban heat island effect in cities of Latin-American Pacific Coast. Procedia Engineering 2016; 169: 199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.10.024
22. Bouramdane AA. Drought: Will the extreme gradually become the norm (French)? Energy/mining & Careers 2022. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7594311
23. Bouramdane AA. Scorching heat, repeated gigantic fires: Signs of climate change (French)? Energy/mining & Careers 2022. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7594264
24. Bouramdane AA. Climate Risks and Energy Transition in Morocco: Vulnerability to Climate Losses and Damages and Uncertainty in the Renewable Electricity Mix Under Different Penetration. Lambert Academic Publishing (LAP); 2023.
25. Bouramdane AA. Potential Site for Offshore Floating Photovoltaic Systems in Morocco: Evaluation Criteria Required Considering Climate Change Effects to Achieve the Energy Trilemma. Lambert Academic Publishing (LAP); 2023.
26. Zelenˇáková M, Abd-Elhamid HF, Baran´czuk K, Baran´czuk J. Assessment and adaptation to climate change and sea level rise impacts on Egypt’s northern coasts. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2022; 1252.
27. Bouramdane AA. Preservation of water resources and energy transition: Floating photovoltaics update (French). Energy/mining & Careers 2023. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8021774
28. Bouramdane AA. Solutions to reduce pressure on water (French). Energy/mining & Careers 2023. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8021765
29. Cea L, Costabile P. Flood risk in urban areas: Modelling, management and adaptation to climate change. A review. Hydrology 2022; 9(3): 50. doi: 10.3390/hydrology9030050
30. Prokić M, Savić S, Pavić D. Pluvial flooding in urban areas across the European continent. Geographica Pannonica 2019; 23(4): 216–232. doi: 10.5937/gp23-23508
31. Gökçekuş H, Kassem Y, Andaque HHS. Interaction between infrastructure and climate change on buildings, roads, and bridges in developed and developing countries: A case of Japan and Mozambique. Future Technology 2023; 2(3): 24–30. doi: 10.55670/fpll.futech.2.3.5
32. Nayal D. Framework for assessment of climate change related risks to buildings. International Journal of Engineering Research 2020; V9(09). doi: 10.17577/ijertv9is090080
33. Bouramdane AA. What is the relationship between agriculture and climate change (French)? Énergie/mines & Carrières 2023. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730008
34. Bouramdane AA. Agrivoltaics, what exactly are we talking about (French)? Énergie/mines & Carrières 2022. doi: 10. 5281/zenodo.7594342
35. Chelli G. Communities’ risk perceptions lessen flood hazards impact. Nature Water 2023; 1(4): 312. doi: 10.1038/s44221-023-00075-8
36. Ann Conyers Z, Grant R, Roy SS. Sea level rise in Miami beach: Vulnerability and real estate exposure. The Professional Geographer 2019; 71(2): 278–291. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2018.1531037
37. Smardon R. Two high risk coastal views. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2019; 10(1): 104–105. doi: 10.1007/s13412-019-00579-4
38. Chao SR, Ghansah B, Grant RJ. An exploratory model to characterize the vulnerability of coastal buildings to storm surge flooding in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Applied Geography 2021; 128: 102413. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102413
39. Pant S, Cha EJ. Effect of climate change on hurricane damage and loss for residential buildings in Miami-Dade County. Journal of Structural Engineering 2018; 144(6). doi: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002038
40. Sedlak D. Water technology on the bully pulpit. Environmental Science & Technology 2015; 50(1): 1–2. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b06239
41. Árvai J, Gregory R. Beyond choice architecture: A building code for structuring climate risk management decisions. Behavioural Public Policy 2020; 5(4): 556–575. doi: 10.1017/bpp.2020.37
42. Huang CZ, Wang Y, Zhang X, et al. Landscape approach South-Florida: Landscape architecture explorations in Miami, Biscayne national park, Lake Okeechobee & Everglades City through Seven MSc-graduation projects. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:204271668 (accessed on 23 November 2023).
43. Tomfort, André. “Making Green Bonds Greener: Proposals to Increase the Efficiency of Green Bonds.” Journal of Applied Finance & Banking 2022.
44. Treuer GA. The psychology of Miami’s struggle to adapt to sea-level rise. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 2018; 74(3): 155–159. doi: 10.1080/00963402.2018.1461970
45. Kreslake JM. Perceived importance of climate change adaptation and mitigation according to social and medical factors among residents of impacted communities in the United States. Health Equity 2019; 3(1): 124–133. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0002
46. Rose EJ. A sinking world: A model framework for climate change adaptation measures in coastal cities. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 2020; 53: 367.
47. Das R, Olivares E, Dominguez S, et al. 422 Addressing complex and urgent problems through innovative team science: The University of Miami Laboratory for Integrative Knowledge (U-LINK). Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2023; 7(s1): 126. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.455
48. Fu X, Song J. Assessing the economic costs of sea level rise and benefits of coastal protection: A spatiotemporal approach. Sustainability 2017; 9(8): 1495. doi: 10.3390/su9081495
49. Gesangyangji, Vimont DJ, Holloway T, et al. A methodology for evaluating the effects of climate change on climatic design conditions for buildings and application to a case study in Madison, Wisconsin. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability 2022; 2(2): 025007. doi: 10.1088/2634-4505/ac6e01
50. Watkins R, Levermore G. Quantifying the effects of climate change and risk level on peak load design in buildings. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 2010; 32(1): 9–19. doi: 10.1177/0143624409357122
51. Maqueda G, Yagüe C, Román-Cascón C, et al. Analysis of temperature trends and urban heat island in Madrid. doi: 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10969
52. Zhou J, Chu Q, Zhang Y. Temperature and humidity characteristics of residential buildings in northern China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2019; 371(2): 022065. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/371/2/022065
53. Shah J, Mishra B. IoT enabled environmental monitoring system for smart cities. 2016 International Conference on Internet of Things and Applications (IOTA) 2016. doi: 10.1109/iota.2016.7562757
54. Seo mun G, Lee H, Yoon J, et al. Investigation on electric energy consumption patterns of residential buildings in four cities through the data mining. Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society 2022; 42(1): 127–139. doi: 10.7836/kses.2022.42.1.127
55. Hoang TV, Nguyen DD, Nguyen MA, et al. A study of energy consumption for office buildings in Vietnam for sustainable energy and climate change mitigation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Evolving Cities 2022. doi: 10.55066/proc-icec.2021.19
56. Ameri S, Rüther N. Hygrothermal risk analysis of recently constructed timber buildings exposed to outdoor climate changes by the end of the century in Germany. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2019; 290(1): 012005. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012005
57. Moges E, Føreid B, Mæhlum T, et al. Sino-European innovative green and smart cities. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:249669354 (accessed on 23 November 2023).
58. Abd-Elhamid HF, Zeleňáková M, Barańczuk J, et al. Historical trend analysis and forecasting of shoreline change at the Nile Delta using RS data and GIS with the DSAS tool. Remote Sensing 2023; 15(7): 1737. doi: 10.3390/rs15071737
59. Zhukova O, Nehoda N. Forecast of changes in climate factors of the city of Kyiv and their impact on the life cycle of buildings. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources 2022; 43(3): 64–72. doi: 10.32347/2411-4049.2022.3.64-72
60. Albatayneh A, Albadaineh R. Comparison of most popular buildings performance simulation tools. CONECT International Scientific Conference of Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023; 57. doi: 10.7250/conect.2023.037
61. Marques G, Saini J, Dutta M, et al. Indoor air quality monitoring systems for enhanced living environments: A review toward sustainable smart cities. Sustainability 2020; 12(10): 4024. doi: 10.3390/su12104024
62. Shelestov A, Sumilo L, Lavreniuk M, et al. Indoor and outdoor air quality monitoring on the base of intelligent sensors for smart city. Recent Developments in Data Science and Intelligent Analysis of Information 2018; 134–145. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97885-7_14
63. Levin I, Arthurson K. Living closely: residents’ health and wellbeing in small multi-owned residential buildings. Property Management 2020; 38(3): 345–363. doi: 10.1108/pm-03-2019-0013
64. Sevindik S, Spataru C. Circular economy and eco-innovation solutions for low-carbon buildings in cities: The case of Kayseri. Sustainability in Environment 2018; 3(3): 230. doi: 10.22158/se.v3n3p230
65. Hollar TL, Melo AF, Maitland K, et al. Social vulnerability and safe building recertification violations in Miami, Florida, 2013–2018. American Journal of Public Health 2022; 112(8): 1217–1220. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2022.306890
66. Wei T, Wu J, Chen S. Keeping track of greenhouse gas emission reduction progress and targets in 167 cities worldwide. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 2021; 3. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2021.696381
67. Wang T. Meteorological zoning strategy for high-density cities based on urban climatic map. Highlights in Art and Design 2022; 1(2): 82–86. doi: 10.54097/hiaad.v1i2.2238
68. Schwarz K, Wohldmann EL, Chen Y, et al. Community knowledge and concerns about urban soil science, practice, and process: Perspectives from the healthy soils for healthy communities initiative in Los Angeles, CA, United States. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 2022; 9. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.781587
69. Yuchi W, Knudby A, Cowper J, et al. A description of methods for deriving air pollution land use regression model predictor variables from remote sensing data in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Canadian Geographies/Géographies Canadiennes 2016; 60(3): 333–345. doi: 10.1111/cag.12279
70. Palermo SA, Maiolo M, Brusco AC, et al. Smart technologies for water resource management: An overview. Sensors 2022; 22(16): 6225. doi: 10.3390/s22166225
71. Frayne C. Green water technologies and resource management for water system heat-transfer applications in the built environment. Journal of Green Building 2010; 5(1): 56–67. doi: 10.3992/jgb.5.1.56
72. Brown IT. Managing cities as urban ecosystems: Analysis tools for biodiversity stewardship in Los Angeles. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:213162497 (accessed on 23 November 2023).
73. Valois L, Brachet A, Schiopu N, et al. Performance assessment of the ecosystem services provided by urban Nature-based solutions: Focus on rainwater management. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2023; 1196(1): 012028. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1196/1/012028
74. Sharma J, Ravindranath NH. Applying IPCC 2014 framework for hazard-specific vulnerability assessment under climate change. Environmental Research Communications 2019; 1(5): 051004. doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/ab24ed
75. Widura E, Mardiatno D. Assessment of the Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI) for disaster mitigation strategies in some coastal tourism areas in Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta-Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2022; 989(1): 012014. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/989/1/012014
76. Ružić I, Dugonjić Jovančević S, Benac Č, et al. Assessment of the coastal vulnerability index in an area of complex geological conditions on the Krka Island, Northeast Adriatic Sea. Geosciences 2019; 9(5): 219. doi: 10.3390/geosciences9050219
77. Marko I, Wittmanová R, Hrudka J, et al. Simulation of urban storm-water runoff in storm-water management model. Pollack Periodica 2022; 17(3): 94–99. doi: 10.1556/606.2022.00553
78. Worley LC, Underwood KL, Vartanian NLV, et al. Semi-automated hydraulic model wrapper to support stakeholder evaluation: A floodplain reconnection study using 2D hydrologic engineering center’s river analysis system. River Research and Applications 2022; 38(4): 799–809. doi: 10.1002/rra.3946
79. Wu W, Yeager KM, Peterson MS, et al. Neutral models as a way to evaluate the Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM). Ecological Modelling 2015; 303: 55–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.008
80. Litardo J, Hidalgo-Leon R, Macias J, et al. Estimating energy consumption and conservation measures for ESPOL Campus main building model using EnergyPlus. 2019 IEEE 39th Central America and Panama Convention (CONCAPAN XXXIX). 20–22 November 2019; Guatemala City, Guatemala.
81. Feudo FL, Morton B, Prados E, et al. An operational application of a LUTI model: Scenarization process, implementation and results of a Tranus-based simulation model for the Urban Region of Grenoble. Transportation Research Procedia 2019; 41: 178–180. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.034
82. Jin J, Lee HY. Understanding residential location choices: An application of the UrbanSim residential location model on Suwon, Korea. International Journal of Urban Sciences 2017; 22(2): 216–235. doi: 10.1080/12265934.2017.1336469
83. Dumenu WK, Takam Tiamgne X. Social vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climate change in Zambia: The applicability of social vulnerability index. SN Applied Sciences 2020; 2(3). doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-2227-0
84. O’Gorman PA, Dwyer JG. Using machine learning to parameterize moist convection: Potential for modeling of climate, climate change, and extreme events. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 2018; 10(10): 2548–2563. doi: 10.1029/2018ms001351
85. Sodha K, Pati P, Rajput D, et al. Review of the study climate change impact assessment on the Gujarat coastline: The role of artificial intelligence, statistical, mathematical and geographic information systems (GIS). International Association of Biologicals and Computational Digest 2023; 2(1): 241-244. doi: 10.56588/iabcd.v2i1.170
86. Olazabal M, de Murieta ES. Bridging science and policy to mitigate and adapt cities to climate change: Challenges and opportunities in the context of the Basque declaration. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55450257 (accessed on 28 November 2023).
87. Lee T, Yang H, Blok A. Does mitigation shape adaptation? The urban climate mitigation-adaptation nexus. Climate Policy 2020; 20(3): 341–353. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1730152
88. Bouramdane AA. Why are mitigation and adaptation to climate change complementary (French)? Énergie/mines & Carrières 2022. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7594404
89. Sharma Y, Saxena BK, Rao KVS. Energy savings in a building at different climatic zones of India by using insulating materials. Green Buildings and Sustainable Engineering 2018; 167–178. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-1202-1_15
90. López-Ordóñez C, Crespo Cabillo I, Roset Calzada J, et al. The role of thermal insulation in the architecture of hot desert climates. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 2019; 433–444. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9868-2_37
91. Asim N, Badiei M, Mohammad M, et al. Sustainability of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems in buildings—An overview. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022; 19(2): 1016. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19021016
92. Knuutila M, Kosonen A, Jaatinen-Värri A, et al. Profitability comparison of active and passive energy efficiency improvements in public buildings. Energy Efficiency 2022; 15(6). doi: 10.1007/s12053-022-10046-9
93. Ratner S, Berezin A, Sergi BS. Energy efficiency improvements under conditions of low energy prices: the evidence from Russian regions. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2021; 17(1). doi: 10.1080/15567249.2021.1966134
94. Bouramdane AA. PV, CSP and wind power in Morocco: Variable geometry integration (French). Énergie/mines & Carrières 2022. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7594221.
95. Bouramdane AA. Identifying large-scale photovoltaic and concentrated solar power hot spots: Multi-criteria decision-making framework. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering 2023; 17(2). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7324107
96. Bouramdane AA. Spatial suitability assessment of onshore wind systems using the analytic hierarchy process. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering 2023; 17(7). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7324223
97. Bouramdane AA. Site suitability of offshore wind energy: A combination of geographic referenced information and analytic hierarchy process. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering 2023; 17(2). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7324191
98. Eicker U, Klein M. Large-scale renewable energy integration within energy-efficient urban areas: Results from three German case studies. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 2012; 9(3): 202–213. doi: 10.1093/ijlct/cts067
99. Bellosio B, Giaccone L, Guerrisi A, et al. Energy networks in sustainable cities: Towards a full integration of renewable systems in urban area. IECON 2011—37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2011; 3146–3151. doi: 10.1109/iecon.2011.6119813
100. Punia A. Analysis of the impact of passive design strategies on energy consumption of a building in composite climate zone. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology 2022; 24(3): 85–93. doi: 10.51201/jusst/22/0282
101. He L. The factors influencing green building design: A perspective from the characteristics of coastal regions. Journal of Coastal Research 2020; 106(sp1): 419. doi: 10.2112/si106-094.1
102. Rui W, Qianyi Z. Application analysis of BIM technology in green intelligent building design. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021; 768(1): 012154. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/768/1/012154
103. Pomponi F, D’Amico B. Low energy architecture and low carbon cities: Exploring links, scales, and environmental impacts. Sustainability 2020; 12(21): 9189. doi: 10.3390/su12219189
104. Febrian Dhini DR, Wonorahardjo S. A review of urban visual environment in transit-oriented development (TOD): Visual comfort and disturbance. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2020; 532(1): 012008. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/532/1/012008
105. Miyani N. Municipal solid waste management-review article. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 2019; 7(3): 1863–1865. doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2019.3347
106. Barbour E, Davila CC, Gupta S, et al. Planning for sustainable cities by estimating building occupancy with mobile phones. Nature Communications 2019; 10(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11685-w
107. Nguyena TTH, Vukorepa I. Amphibious housing for flood-prone rural areas in Vietnam, 2017. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:207834317 (accessed on 28 November 2023).
108. La Rosa D, Privitera R. Green infrastructure and private property: The crucial relationship for the sustainable future of cities. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2020; 381–392. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_29
109. Zehnsdorf A, Willebrand KCU, Trabitzsch R, et al. Wetland roofs as an attractive option for decentralized water management and air conditioning enhancement in growing cities—A review. Water 2019; 11(9): 1845. doi: 10.3390/w11091845
110. Yagoub MM. Earthquake preparedness: The case of Eastern UAE. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 2016; 9: 1–9.
111. Yu F, Fan B, Li X. Improving emergency preparedness to cascading disasters: A case‐driven risk ontology modelling. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 2020; 28(3): 194–214. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12314
112. Bank W, Gaza. Environmental and social assessment. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:146445939 (accessed on 28 November 2023).
113. Cao K, Dabelko-Schoeny H, Choi MS, White K. Age-Friendly initiatives and reducing social isolation: Roles of physical environment and community engagement. Innovation in Aging 2018; 2: 903–903.
114. Li Z, Ma Z, Zhou G. Impact of land use change on habitat quality and regional biodiversity capacity: Temporal and spatial evolution and prediction analysis. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2022; 10. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1041573
115. Abd-Elkawy AAM. Types and tools of land use zoning towards dealing with private properties in replanning inner informal areas (case study: Maspero Triangle—Cairo Governorate). American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences 2020; 74: 1–37.
116. Zuama SN, Sumardjoko B, Harsono, et al. Resilience’s awareness building strategy in early childhood. Proceedings of the International Conference of Learning on Advance Education (ICOLAE 2021). 2022.
117. Bharati A, Thakur R, More P. Disaster and Security Management System for Smart Cities using Internet of Things. International Journal of Global Technology Initiatives 2018; 6.
118. Shan T. Intelligent CCTV via planetary sensor network, 2007. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:109299713 (accessed on 28 November 2023).
119. Aboualola M, Abualsaud K, Khattab T, et al. Edge technologies for disaster management: A survey of social media and artificial intelligence integration. IEEE Access 2023; 11: 73782–73802. doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3293035
120. Yahya M, Mabe Parenreng J, Suhartono, et al. Early warning urgent logistic disaster in rural area based on classification algorithm: Indonesian case. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 5th International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE); 24 November 2021.
121. Holzbecher E, Hadidi A, Volp N, et al. Advanced tools for flood management: An early warning system for arid and semiarid regions. Wadi Flash Floods 2021; 209–223. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-2904-4_7
122. Hasan R, Hasan R, Islam T. Smart city technology for disaster management: Demonstrating the use of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons for emergency alert dissemination. In: Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 19th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC); 8 January 2022.
123. Tejani D, Al-Kuwari AMAH, Potdar V. Energy conservation in a smart home. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (IEEE DEST 2011); May 2011.
124. Aqib M, Mehmood R, Alzahrani A, et al. A smart disaster management system for future cities using deep learning, GPUs, and in-memory computing. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing 2019; 159–184. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-13705-2_7
125. Wang Y, Kong T. Air quality predictive modeling based on an improved decision tree in a weather-smart grid. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 172892–172901. doi: 10.1109/access.2019.2956599
126. Gayrard JD. Roles of communication broadband satellites in Public Protection and Disaster Relief. In: Proceedings of the 54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law; 29 September 2003.
127. Faraci G, Rizzo SA, Schembra G. Green edge intelligence for smart management of a FANET in disaster-recovery scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2023; 72(3): 3819–3831. doi: 10.1109/tvt.2022.3217331
128. Bouramdane AA. How to manage vulnerabilities in the renewable energy environment? Leadvent Group, Renewable Energy Cyber Security Forum, Berlin, Germany 2023; doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730062
129. Motion Detection to Preserve Personal Privacy from Surveillance Data using Contrary Motion. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:242557392 (accessed on 28 November 2023).
130. Prasad MG. Community disaster risk reduction using indigenous knowledge, integrating with climate smart interventions in Coastal Andhra Pradesh. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 2017; 32(S1): S108. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x17003119
131. Droutsa KG, Balaras CA, Dascalaki EG, et al. Key performance indicators for sustainable mediterranean buildings and cities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2023; 1196(1): 012076. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1196/1/012076
132. Surahman U, Kubota T, Higashi O. Life cycle assessment of energy and CO2 emissions for residential buildings in Jakarta and Bandung, Indonesia. Buildings 2015; 5(4): 1131–1155. doi: 10.3390/buildings5041131
133. Krych K, Heeren N, Hertwich EG. Factors influencing the life-cycle GHG emissions of Brazilian office buildings. Buildings and Cities 2021; 2(1): 856–873. doi: 10.5334/bc.136
134. Won C, No S, Alhadidi Q. Factors affecting energy performance of large-scale office buildings: Analysis of benchmarking data from New York City and Chicago. Energies 2019; 12(24): 4783. doi: 10.3390/en12244783
135. Herazo B, Lizarralde G. The influence of green building certifications in collaboration and innovation processes. Construction Management and Economics 2015; 33(4): 279–298. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2015.1047879
136. Giaveno S, Osello A, Garufi D, et al. Embodied carbon and embodied energy scenarios in the built environment. Computational design Meets EPDs. Sustainability 2021; 13(21): 11974. doi: 10.3390/su132111974
137. Kumar G, Thakur B, De S. Energy performance of typical large residential apartments in Kolkata: implementing new energy conservation building codes of India. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2021; 23(4): 1251–1271. doi: 10.1007/s10098-020-02022-7
138. Bonakdar A, Audirac I. City branding and the link to urban planning: Theories, practices, and challenges. Journal of Planning Literature 2019; 35(2): 147–160. doi: 10.1177/0885412219878879
139. Schrotter G, Hürzeler C. The digital twin of the city of Zurich for urban planning. PFG—Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science 2020; 88(1): 99–112. doi: 10.1007/s41064-020-00092-2
140. Dabaieh M, Iarkov I, Rodil K. The ‘Z-Free’ home: A circular thinking and eco-cycle design practice. Energies 2023; 16(18): 6536. doi: 10.3390/en16186536
141. Lerer SM, Madsen H, Andersen JS, et al. Applying the “WSUD Potential”—Tool in the framework of the Copenhagen climate adaptation and cloudburst management plans, 2016. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:133587838 (accessed on 28 November 2023).
142. Ziersen J, Clauson-Kaas J, Rasmussen J. The role of Greater Copenhagen Utility in implementing the city’s Cloudburst Management Plan. Water Practice and Technology 2017; 12(2): 338–343. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2017.039
143. Han H. Governance for green urbanisation: Lessons from Singapore’s green building certification scheme. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 2018; 37(1): 137–156. doi: 10.1177/2399654418778596
144. Xiong C, Chen J. Singapore’s Aarden city construction and green building development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2018; 153: 062072. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/153/6/062072
145. Hernández D, Chang D, Hutchinson C, et al. Public housing on the periphery: Vulnerable residents and depleted resilience reserves post-hurricane sandy. Journal of Urban Health 2018; 95(5): 703–715. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0280-4
146. Jabareen Y. The deficient resilient cities: Hurricane sandy in New York City. The Risk City 2015; 161–177. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9768-9_8
147. DuPuis EM, Greenberg M. The right to the resilient city: Progressive politics and the green growth machine in New York City. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2019; 9(3): 352–363. doi: 10.1007/s13412-019-0538-5
148. Hidalgo D, Muñoz JC. A review of technological improvements in bus rapid transit (BRT) and buses with high level of service (BHLS). Public Transport 2014; 6(3): 185–213. doi: 10.1007/s12469-014-0089-9
149. Betancur JJ, Brand P. Revisiting Medellin’s governance arrangement after the dust settled. Urban Affairs Review 2021; 59(1): 73–98. doi: 10.1177/10780874211047938
150. Corburn J, Asari MR, Pérez Jamarillo J, et al. The transformation of Medellin into a ‘City for Life’: Insights for healthy cities. Cities & Health 2019; 4(1): 13–24. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2019.1592735
151. Bouramdane AA. Energy transition: Research issues (French). Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/7594484 (accessed on 28 November 2023).
152. Bouramdane AA. Minerals of the energy transition: Geological, geostrategic and environmental criticality (French). Énergie/mines & Carrières 2023. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7594617
153. Gómez G, Frutos B, Alonso C, et al. Prediction of thermal comfort and energy behaviour through natural-based solutions implementation: A case study in Badajoz, Spain, 2020. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:228836535 (accessed on 28 November 2023).
154. Pietras CJ. Rule-governed behavior and climate change: Why climate warnings fail to motivate sufficient action. Behavior and Social Issues 2022; 31(1): 373–417. doi: 10.1007/s42822-022-00109-y
155. Hooli LJ. Resilience of the poorest: Coping strategies and indigenous knowledge of living with the floods in Northern Namibia. Regional Environmental Change 2015; 16(3): 695–707. doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0782-5
156. Tomateo C. Indigenous land systems and emerging of Green Infrastructure planning in the Peruvian coastal desert: Tensions and opportunities. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2021; 23(5): 683–700. doi: 10.1080/1523908x.2021.1960806
157. Feeney M, Grohnert T, Gijselaers W, et al. Organizations, learning, and sustainability: A cross-disciplinary review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 2022; 184(1): 217–235. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05072-7
158. Becchetti L, Pisani F, Raffaele L. Co-planning and co-design as progress in the implementation of welfare services. International Review of Economics 2023; 70(3): 301–322. doi: 10.1007/s12232-023-00420-z
159. Bouramdane AA. Lessons learned from international climate negotiations: Mitigation. Climate Finance for Losses and Damages, and Adaptation 2022. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20042.44488/1
160. Hamilton M, Lubell M. Collaborative governance of climate change adaptation across spatial and institutional scales. Policy Studies Journal 2017; 46(2): 222–247. doi: 10.1111/psj.12224
161. Hamilton M, Mark N. Lubell. Climate change adaptation, social capital, and the performance of polycentric governance institutions. Climatic Change 2019; 152: 307-326.
162. van Nieuwaal K, Langenberg V, Odhengo P. Knowledge exchange and capacity building in deltas: Experiences of the Delta Alliance. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 2023; 26(2): 80–86. doi: 10.14321/aehm.026.02.080
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/issc.v3i1.190
(141 Abstract Views, 64 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ayat-Allah Bouramdane
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
